Why Do I Show Artists From the Past?
Of course art is about now. It's about your experience in this moment. Over time prevailing styles in painting change partly because every generation sees a little differently. After I'd painted for only a couple of years I began to hear the whispers artists from the past sounding a little louder. What they were saying with their work started to echo how I was feeling.
Waterhouse I'm sure did the same. But here he's taking a side trip to show us other things he felt we should be sure to notice. For example the way he deftly draws the outline of the woman's chin, neck and shoulder hard and dark and then fills the resulting empty space with a darker tone than in the rest of the background. It's his way of calling you to attention and saying "look at how great these shapes are."
In this other Waterhouse drawing the entire face is toned down in favor of elegant geometry of the woman's wrist, collar, and the bottom edge of her hair as it climbs and then falls over her shoulder.
At their best, old painters like Waterhouse show us a world where they didn't settle for just any accident or drip of the brush as being good enough.
There's an insistence and a rigorousness to the way they'd go after just a certain look for a shape or a color. They'd even practice their moves to get it right, as in this preparatory oil study below Waterhouse did for his painting The Naiad from 1893.
One of the things I get a kick out of is how particular the artist is in his rendering of the face- letting the one eye dominate and in turn softening the contrasts around the Naiad's nose. Waterhouse knew well that he could overload his viewers with information and took pains to tone down passages he felt less important. Doesn't the woman above seem to be staring at something?
Here's the entire canvas:
Naiads by the way were Greek mythological female water spirits who dowelled in streams and brooks. One gets the feeling life is about to get a bit more complicated for our innocent sleeping figure of Hylas on the stream's bank.
I know realist painters of our time who dismiss modernism in art and everything it has brought about. Some feel everything since Picasso has gone south. I don't feel that way.
God knows there is a lot of work done today that ends up more pretentious and downright silly than not. But given time, most of it is going to be forgotten up in that cobweb-filled attic of time. Some pieces from our time will survive and still be valued. Exactly which is any one's guess.